Sunday, 26 January 2014

The Randomizer returns! + Top Ten Films I've seen in 2013

The Randomizer has returned!

Yay!!

Baby turtle agrees

Happy New Year to you all. I hope the first month of January  has been good to you, and family members, pets, posters etc, and you might have been wondering 'Where is my fortnightly dose of random stuff to look at?!?!"

Well as some of you may know, I have been writing a 1st draft of my book. Literally writing. So I've been taking some time to do that. But also with the Randomizer, I have found it difficult to try and keep entertaining with new ideas for a fortnight last year. Though I do consider a good number of them good articles, I do think that some of them I could've done better for myself and for your entertainment. So I'm considering CUTTING back from fortnightly to ONCE A MONTH. That way I can have fresh ideas to come to the table, and hopefully keep you laughing or just freaked out. Either way makes me happy.

What's just as important is that this year is the 100th year of the start of the First World War. You will have no doubt that this is an important anniversary to commemorate and I will be doing an article at some point to talk about it. So keep your eyes peeled for that, and I hope you understand where I'm coming from, and continue enjoying these articles as great joys.

With that done, let's get to the Top Ten Movies I saw in 2013

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

2013 was a bit of a difficult year for me. I didn't really get a good chance to see a film for at least 4/5 months, with a few gaps give or take in between for the rest of June through to December. 22 films I've seen all around, including DVDs. Believe me when I say, it's not an easy list to compile. There have been films that I thought were quite good to start with, but as time went by I found myself questioning certain aspects of some films, like plot developments, characters, etc. I did find it a bit hard to come back from that really.

But for all that some of the films were really enjoyable to watch. Some of the twists in some films really got me intrigued (one giggling like a lunatic), one was a good satire to watch, and one where I was influenced (ahembossedahemmibsahem) to watch. So I did really have some fun watching these films and I obviously need to do better at watching them this year. But for now, BRING THE LIST ON!!! THERE WILL BE SPOILERS BY THE WAY. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED. END CAPITAL MESSAGE!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
10.

IRON MAN 3.........ahem sorry


A film with a controversial twist, Iron Man 3 sees Tony Stark suffering from panic attacks following from events in The Avengers, and has built 40 odd Iron Man suits, creating problems with Pepper Potts. When an attack happens by one called 'The Mandarin' which nearly kills Happy Hogan (and prompting Shane Black to take over directing duties), Stark directly challenges the Mandarin, and has his house blown up in the process. Stark, in a deadly alliance with a 10 year old, finds out that the bombings are related to a treatment called 'Extremis', and goes to investigate more in Miami, finding out a strange truth and fights the Mandarin, winning the day and having that pesky piece of shrapnel taken out from the first film.
Let's get the twist out of the way shall we? The Mandarin is in fact an actor called Trevor Slattery (played by Sir Ben Kingsley), and the real Mandarin is in fact Aldrich Killian (played by Guy Pearce). Second well-known twist of last year on par or above Khan because Marvel is more bigger nowadays.

Like the twist with Star Trek, I did absolutely feel to pieces, laughing that Kingsley was a complete misguided villain, instead having Guy Pearce as the main threat. In a good way I mean, I liked it. It was quite well done, keeping Killian in the background and revealing him when the time called for it.
So what could I say about Killian? Well, he's not a bad bad guy per se, at least that's what I thought at first. But then I read an article saying that the Iron Man villains do not have the full justification of being proper villains, more just characters to oppose Tony because a)business, b)revenge and c) revenge again.
That...does have a good ring to it. If you think about it, the villain's motivations aren't very well explained.

People harp on for Killian's motivations being quite skewered, though I was confused by Obadiah Staine's motivation to get Tony out of the way so he could take control. I really don't remember anywhere in the film saying 'I want to take control of Stark because..." and so on. Whiplash from......that film.....kind of had something going on with his quest for revenge I guess? But that went out of the window when he had his own suit of armour. All of them are simple and stupid at the same time. Guy Pearce was quite menacing as Killian and could show a clever mind, but the character is left out in the cold a bit, his cause for revenge somewhat contentious at best.

So what are the good bits about Iron Man 3? Well, I do like the plot, and how Tony actually does pay for his consequences in this film, seeing how he copes without the suit and gathering information with a bit of help from Rhody and that weird guy who wanted to be like him. The Christmas setting....not sure it's really needed, could have been set at anytime, but this is kind of nitpicking and it doesn't distract much. It was a good story that does the job well.

Acting wise, Robert Downy Jr does a good job as Tony Stark (as ever) and actually in my opinion did a good version of someone suffering from Post-Traumatic-Stress-Disorder. He's become less of a cocky man and more introverted, and we see how Downy Jr turns the development of this character into even more of an ass-kicker, even without the suit. Actually, the acting overall is really good. Ben Kingsley played a better role then what I've seen in recent memory, Gwyneth Paltrow was good in her role as always with Pepper Potts showing her range of loving Tony and wondering how to cope with her beau's difficult life at the present time, Don Cheadle as Rhody was great at being sarcastic at times and trying to help Tony through as a good side-kick and Paul Bettany is as ever static as JARVIS.

I do believe I have converted to Christianity sir. It's from researching the Da Vinci Code

Iron Man 3 is one of the few good threeqeuls I have ever seen. A great twist, good characters (though bit silly at times), good acting and good action sets. One of the best Marvel films I had seen and wouldn't mind sitting down with my chestnuts roasting on an open fire and watching to my heart's content. It's the kind of film that is just pure fun and fantasy.

(Actually I don't want my chestnuts roasting on an open fire. It would hurt getting them off in the first place).

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

9.

The Cabin in the Woods


What do you think about when you see the poster? Confused, intrigued, why is it looking like a Rubik's Cube?

Five college friends Dana, Jules, Marty, Holden and Chris Hemsworth go to spend a weekend at said Cabin in the Woods.

*SPOILERS (highlight if you want)
However in the most unconventional twist, they are actually being watched by two underground facility technicians, who are planning to use the five of them as sacrifices to applease the 'Ancient Ones'. The five are representations of the archetypal sterotypes: The Whore, the Athlete, the Scholar, The Fool and the Virgin (who could be taken or survives as long as the others die). Jules, Holden and Chris Hemsworth all snuff it, except for Dana and Marty whom discover the facility that holds a whole array of different horror creatures and release them. Soon the facility is destroyed and the two make their way to a temple underground, where Sigourney Weaver encourages Dana to kill Marty. Dana refuses and Weaver and a werewolf fall down to the Ancient Ones. Dana and Marty share a joint together as the Ancient Ones rise up and destroy the world. Bummer.

*END SPOILERS

This film did throw me off at first with its opening and I was like....what the fuck is this? What's going on? But as the film goes along, it does show an intriguing set-up in subverting the genre of horror and more specifically slasher films, like those I talked about in my American Horror Remakes article. When you get around to watching The Cabin in the Woods, the ideas that are played about with at the beginning and end of the film are really interesting, given the amount of creative ideas that the Horror genre has to offer. For what it's worth, it was an enjoyable watch.

Everyone did a good job in their roles, with some very good acting here and there, but there wasn't many specific stand outs apart from Chris Hemsworth as far as I remember. He was a pretty good badass in this role. Then again he's always a good badass in what I've seen. The one cameo in the film was pretty neat and came out of nowhere, but it was nice to see that specific person make such an appearance. Some of the deaths scenes as well are pretty shocking and can be actually be funny at times, especially with one of the five, where I couldn't really help but laugh at now. Don't remember doing it at the time.

I can't note anything that was specifically bad at all, but I suppose with the direction it took in being a satire of the horror genre as a horror film (if that makes sense), it's different in a nice way. It's pretty much an indie film with a lot to say, but no one will take much notice of it. In addition, it's a point to say that the film was made in 2009, but got its release 3 years later. If it came out during a point where the remakes of Friday the 13th and Nightmare on Elm Street were, maybe more people would have taken more notice.

Note to producers: have better ideas for release dates please

The Cabin in the Woods is a good romp through on a Saturday night given the opportunity. Give it a go and see what you make of it.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

8.

Despicable Me 2

Not actual poster, but thought it would be funny

If you ever meet my brother Huw, please don't say you have never seen Despicable Me or Despicable Me 2. He will promptly take you round to his house, force you onto a chair and make you watch it. Oh, and don't say you're a Norwich City football fan. He will give you a lecture why Ipswich Town are the better team in more ways than one. Or a Sunderland fan for that matter either. Actually screw Sunderland, NEWCASTLE ARE BETTER!

(ahem).......Moving on, Despicable Me 2 is a really good and really funny film, giving a good balance between the main character Gru and his little bunch of awesome yellow buddies, The Minions. I'll admit, I wasn't that interested in watching the Despicable Me series to begin with. All I knew about it was my brother having the minions as ringtones, and talking about how good a film it was non-stop. When he brought Despicable Me 2 to watch, I decided to give it a go and see what the fuss was about. Boy, did I miss out much?

The film opens with a secret laboratory being captured with a secret magnet, and Gru, whom is now father to three girls Margo, Edith and Agnes, is called by the Anti-Villain League (leader known by the way of 'Ramsbottom') to investigate who did such an act. He is partnered with Lucy Wilde to search the Paradise Shopping Mall for said person with evil magnet. The Minions in the meantime, get captured one by one and are turned from their yellow demeanour into purple raving lunatics (Minion: oooooooooh. Me: .......PSSHHHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!). Gru also eventually falls in love with Lucy. So, will Gru get with Lucy in the end, and find out who the bad guy is? Will the Minions ever have enough holidays?

Spoiler: NEVER!

I was pleasantly surprised watching this. I suppose people got a lot more laughs out of watching the Minions on-screen then what was happening on-screen, myself included. There are some good comedy bits with Gru and co in the film, especially where the relationship between him and Lucy is concerned, her being a wacky character while Gru was.....well, Gru. The three girls have their own little branches of storyline too, showing a bit more humanity and emotions, especially with Agnes looking for a mother figure. I think those situations were pretty good to show, even having Margo NOT get with the little asshole at the end. The Minions are the comedic foil to those little dramatic bits, and they were great in their own right. Silly, but not over the top silly.

Some people might agree with me on this, but after watching the two films, I do think that the second one is better, probably because it's more funnier. Obviously Minions are cool.

One surprise I had wondered was who was playing Dr. Nefario in the films, and to my shock it was Russell Brand. Russell Brand. The guy who would more than willingly shag anything that moves. I do find it difficult to separate the two characters apart with the knowledge that Brand is playing a deeper-voiced version of himself. Wonder if he used that voice with Katy Perry......better not go into that territory.
For all intents and purposes despite the film being good, I think I have seen better films this year as you'll see. I do like Despicable Me 2 and I am glad I've seen it now. I really wouldn't mind watching it again for the sheer hell of it, but some films are funnier to me than this, with just great lines, surreal stuff, and sheer insanity.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
7.

Chronicle


This film doesn't have that many great lines and surreal stuff, but it is quite insane. The Good kind of Insane. Like Quentin Tarantino.

Andrew Detmer starts to keep a video-diary of his life, showing his mother having cancer and his father being a stereotypical ass-hole who actually does HIT his son. His video-taping strikes the ire of some people, especially at a party with his cousin Matt. He is convinced by popular student Steve to record a hole in the woods, which is holding a large blue crystal object. Upon inspection, they are stricken by nosebleeds and the camera cuts out. Weeks later, we see they have developed telekinetic abilities and initially use them for pranks until Andrew pushes a rude motorist off the highway and into a river, Matt urges them to restrict their usage. As the story goes on, Andrew becomes more and more alone and angry, eventually seeing himself as an apex predator........

The story was very good to watch, seeing how Andrew develops more of an aggressive personality, using his new found powers to eventually strike out against his tormentors and those few people who do actually like him. He is quite the complex character, so you do see what abuse is going on in his life and feel sympathetic to him in one way. It is a steady downfall, slowly unfurls before your eyes.

One of the things I also liked was the visual effects. Compared to somewhat obvious CGI you see in mainstream films, the way it's handled is really good. Almost everything looks natural as you see Andrew crushing a car with his hand, the three of them flying through the air and almost getting killed by an aeroplane, Andrew actually RIPPING a tooth out of a bully. The timing of each effect is near perfect, especially helped by the sound effects too. You could really hear the velocity of each effect as Andrew uses his powers to do whatever he does. I won't spoil what happens at the end, but needless to say, it's a visual effect storm. So much better than most visual effect films I've seen in my near 25 years on this world.
Green Lantern take note

In addition, it does do a clever thing of not using conventional filming techniques, instead using video-cameras to highlight the action and drama going around. It's kind of like Cloverfield, except this was a bit more stronger. But....if I have to nitpick a little bit, did he really need to film himself all the time? I know it's a video-diary but still, wouldn't someone notice or pick it up? Apart for that, it doesn't really hurt the film.
In fact, I don't think it has many major faults at all. Acting wasn't bad overall, story is great (even going quite dark) and like I said, the visual effects are just great. I think there's a lot to go on from this film. I have read that there is a sequel in the works, but no other information is available. If a sequel is to be done, it needs to be done properly and slowly reveal what is going with that blue crystal at the beginning that gave them their powers in the first place. That said, Chronicle is a great film. One of the best I've seen all year.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
6.

The Big Lebowski


I should probably have one person to thank for influencing....yes, influencing. Definately no bossing about at all....my watching some films this year. That is Mibs Bayliss. She likes to make sure I am on the right track and make sure I develop some good taste in films. I think it's worked well. Well.....a little. In this film's respect it has hit a winner.

The Big Lewbowski: Cult film, surreal as fuck, and a great joy to watch.

The Dude (played by Jeff Bridges) is beaten up by two thugs and his rug peed on, who have confused him with another gentleman called 'The Big Lebowski' because they share the same surname. Seeking compensation he goes to said Lebowski but is refused. Days later, he is called up again to hear that Lebowski's wife has been kidnapped and is roped into the situation, acting as a courier to give one million dollars to her kidnappers. At the same time, he likes to go bowling with his two friends, Walter (John Goodman) and Donny (Steve Buscemi) who get caught up in the situation too.

Watching the film itself, the comedy was a great joy for me. The lines of dialogue are fantastic (I love the description of what a man is), the characters are bizarre yet weirdly relatable, and the plot though confusing and goes all around, is interesting to unfold before your eyes. There were some real gems of laughter from me, especially at an action right near the end of the film which is such bad taste but I really couldn't help myself. I won't spoil what it is, but believe me it is so bad, it's hilarious.

But I also wonder perhaps that The Big Lebowski is an acquired taste, for those who enjoy the surreal and daft moments this film has. Sometimes what appears visually onscreen can be so bizarre that I can understand why people would go:.....what? I can imagine a few of my friends looking at this film and just see them have blank expressions on their faces when watching. Not that there's anything wrong with that of course, but that is probably one of the reasons why it's a cult film, Because of its surreal branch of comedy.
Now I kept along with the plot well enough (I like to think so there), but I think I must have missed something when the truth is reveal about 'Lebowski' because I got quite confused when it was said by The Dude. Granted this is only a nitpick again, so I won't go on about it. I can't really think of anything bad to talk about in this film at all. I just happen to think it was a great work of film. But I'll admit I don't think I'll be getting into the cult of The Dude anytime soon. I have Doctor Who for that.

If you don't know what I mean by cult, The Dude is the focus of many subjects of debate. Philosophical books, conventions, you name  it. The film has become something a bit more bigger around the world. But I'll admit I'm not sure I would really get into that kind of thing myself. I'm more content with abiding with the idea of the Dude as something bigger, like taking pleasure in the simple things of life. But I wouldn't go as far as seeing him bigger than perhaps he was meant to be. He is a pretty awesome character, and that's that.


If you're still on the fence on watching The Big Lebowski, I would say: Do it. Because one) It's one of those films where you won't know unless you've seen it. It's a unique experience to watch. Two) You might understand the cult of The Dude a little better. Three) What else do you have better to do on a night? All I can say is I'll hope you'll enjoy it!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
5.

Rush




Now this is where it gets a bit harder for me to talk about what films I enjoyed more because I loved these top five films. You will not believe how long I can sit at a computer and still not come to a decision about which ones I preferred the most over all of them. But it has to be done, and I might even regret in future what I've put up for the top five. Now's not the time for that however.

At number Five is Rush.

In 1976, one of the most intense sporting rivalries appeared on-screen. Apologies if I've lost you already thanks to the word sporting. James Hunt and Niki Lauda faced off against each other for the coverted Formula One championship (which oddly had been won by Michael Schumacher anyway so no one really cared. And won again by Sebastian Vettel a month after that. Bloody Germans!) As they raced against each other, each plays dirty tricks on each other until the dreaded Nurburgring where a horrific accident will affect the standings of that year.....

With some of the sporting films I've seen like The Damned United, I think the best sport films don't only focus on the sport, they focus on the characters as well. Rush is one of those films, obviously. Two contrasting styles with Lauda and Hunt pushing each other to the limit as they race physically and emotionally, as Lauda discredits Hunt's team for breaking the rules, and Hunt discrediting Lauda for wanting to cancel a race for fear of losing points. The conflict is well done with Chris Hemsworth and Daniel Bruhl playing the two drivers getting at each other's throats.

The way it is shot helps in that respect, as you see each driver pushing the gear sticks and buttons to get ahead of the other, and needing a bit of luck too. But when the drama is simply being played out, the shots are more slower paced, and allow for some air to breath. The weird thing is they don't contrast with each other, they actually help gel the film together more easily. In a way, the film is a good technical achievement as those making it knew what bits to keep slow and what to push up.

What is bugging me at the moment is re-watching clips I do get an idea that Chris Hemsworth is good in the role, but that's it. Just good in the role. I'm not sure being next to Daniel Bruhl helped either because the way he voices those lines out just sounds better then Hemsworth did. That was the major difference between the two actors. They picked up physical habits well, but the way they sounded in their roles just made that much of a difference.

Also there are always the historical inaccuracies that spring up in the film. But these little issues don't bother me that much, despite my own insistence at times for historical accuracy. I was quite surprised by Hunt's actions after a certain press conference in the film. Those who've seen it will understand what I'm talking about. But I suppose that was to create an easy sense of more drama then was actually needed. It's a difficult fence to lean on for the moment.
I'm sure Jesus would approve

Despite some inconsistancies, Rush was a good watch overall. Even if you're not a sporty kind of person, you can get into the drama happening on-screen from both the competitive nature coming out of both Hunt and Lauda as they attempt to out-match the other to victory.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4.

Flight


As I was writing out this list, the film suddenly popped into my head as something I had completely left out! Curse myself! This was a film that I had watched with great interested and was not sorely disappointed.
Denzel Washington plays Whip Whittaker, an airline pilot with a drug and alcohol dependency. Not a bad combination at all! Unfortunately, the plane he is on suddenly jolts as he naps and he wakes up, and attempts to make a safe landing, eventually rolling the plane upside down and crashing in an open field. As he recovers, he finds that only 6 people died on the plane out of 102. He also finds out some weeks later that he was tested while unconscious for a toxicity report. Seeing that he could very well be charged on grounds for drinking, drug and manslaughter, Will attempts to get out of it by lying his way through towards the subsequent trial......

The biggest talking point of this film is of course Denzel Washington. And of course, I was swayed by his performance at the time. And I'm still pretty swayed now. Re-watching one important scene with him, you see how he is confused at the prospect of doing a lie that will not condemn him as it will do another. Hearing his voice, seeing his face as he goes into the drive of such a character, it is an amazing performance. The scenes where he is quite drunk as well were well done too, seeing everything on display as he screws up his life further and further is quite breathtaking and amazing to see.

As a story it is pretty fascinating to see, nearly always from Denzel Washington's viewpoint, seeing how his life works and what happens as he sinks deeper and deeper into his lies, affecting almost everyone around him. He finds love, he gets involved in the investigation (sort of) and he even asks someone close to lie for him so his ass is saved. It is quite sad to see him go through everything, but it does in a way create an interesting dynamic to seeing how he works and I'm wondering how long can this addiction hold out for? Perhaps in essence that's what the film's about: How far will one go when it comes to being addicted to protect themselves? In his case, it's pretty far.

But I WILL admit there are some things I didn't quite fully catch or thought were just plain weird. When he is in a stairwell with a fellow addict and a cancer patient, I found it difficult to hear what the conversation was about. Seriously I had to put subtitles on to hear what was being said, when they talk about random events being God's work, and death and what have you. I don't really want to put the subtitles whenever a movie's on, but I only do it in case I don't understand it fully. Still, a little clarity on sound can be nice at nearly every point.

Speaking of God, one of the characters is the co-pilot when the plane crashes and he talks about God. That was all fine and dandy. What I LAUGHED at was his wife saying "Praise God" at every random moment during the scene. Obviously he doesn't know how to stop the repeating. Should press off and on again, that would sort it. Wonder if Washington felt the same way?

Yes

Apart from those little issues, I did really enjoy Flight, thinking it was one of the best films I've ever seen all around that 2013. The story was great, Washington is great, it is a great film all around. But it's wasn't THE best film I had seen all year. As you will see....

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.

The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug


Continuing on from the last film, The Desolation of Smaug follows the Company of Dwarves and Bilbo as they continue their journey to the Lonely Mountain, going through the Mirkwood Forest where they encounter more spiders, more elves (including a dick one, a CGI one and a completely fictional one), and the almighty dragon itself, Smaug. In the meantime, Gandalf turns detective to investigate the ruins of Dol Guldur where the Necromancer is residing, and discovers quite the discovery of the minellium.

First things first, Smaug was AWESOME to look at. Just to see him make his first full appearance in towering glory over the little hobbit was simply awe-inspiring. To be honest, I wasn't sure of his quick appearance at the end of An Unexpected Journey, but whatever fears I had were completely blown up (no pun intended) by the sheer size of him. It helped being voiced by Benedict Cumberbatch too, and I think I got all the more enjoyment out of this then I did from Star Trek. His conversations with Bilbo (insert Sherlock gag here) were enjoyable, seeing the two use their wits against each other and playing a sort of sick game, with really only one probable outcome: Smaug giving you one hell of an orgasm. It is Benedict Cumberbatch after all.

"You know how many times I've had to change my trousers Tauriel? Three times today" "Yeah I know the feeling"

Some of you might be wondering what I think about the addition of Tauriel, the female elf of Mirkwood. I don't think she's bad at all, and I don't care if she's a new addition. She is a pretty good character to have around, to show some sort of wise nature about her and be against her master Tharanduil, the king of Mirkwood. I am curious to know if she is going to die in There and Back Again. It would make sense in the scheme of things, and allows for something interesting to happen. Evangeline Lily plays her pretty well, playing a nice game with Kili and coming to feel some sort of attraction for him. It is an interesting turn for the Hobbit series to play with.

The action, what there is, was well done too. Seeing CGI Legolas and Tauriel kick the Orc's ass was nice, but some bits can be a little distracting, like when the elves are jumping through the trees as the dwarves are in the barrels. Sometimes it can be a little jarring, but happily it just flies by. Interestingly enough, things do get a little more gory so to speak. There are quite a number of beheadings in this film, most of them orcs, but it's something I've never really seen that clearly before, at least not in any war film I've seen before. Perhaps this is to do with the film becoming more darker to match the tone of the LOTR trilogy.

To be quite honest, most of this film more or less focuses on the characters themselves as they confront each other a lot, and we get to see quite a bit of development. Most of it was really good to see and feels as if it's been done right at all, especially with Smaug and Bilbo (insert second Sherlock pun here), but there are some good bits with Tauriel and Kili possibly hitting it off. Something that I think will end in tragedy. Booo.
So I suppose come the end, The Desolation of Smaug is a great film and I can't find many opinionated faults in it at all. Becoming a little more complex at that with including the more character development, good action despite less of it and pretty much the BEST dragon I've seen in film in my life. I want to see the next one NOW dammit!

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.

The Hunger Games: Catching Fire

Wonder who knew this would be on my list? Hands up! Be honest!.........you all get biscuits if you tell the truth. No? You all fail

Those of you who have read my first article on the Top Ten Films I've Seen in 2012 will know that The Hunger Games was my favourite movie from that year.

So the film picks up from the last film, we see Katniss Everdeen (Jennifer Lawerence) now suffering from some form of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder having to tour with her District 12 companion Peeta Mellark for their victory parade. At first, her rebellious streak comes out with the death of her friend Rue, but after an old man is killed citing the whistle Katniss used in The Hungers Games, she has to comply with her mentor and Peeta to not say anything that will cause rebellion. President Snow and his new cohort Plutarch Heavensbee who come up with an easy plan to rid themselves of her: The 75th Hunger Games will include past tributes, and Katniss is among one of them.......

It's the little bits for me that got me interested into this film. Right from the start of the tour, we see Katniss crack from seeing the image of Rue in District 11, seeing the wedding dress being turned into that of a mocking jay thanks to the work of Cinna, and right at the end with Katniss simply staring into the camera. The facial expressions Jennifer Lawerence did were pretty breathtaking to see before my eyes. The only annoying thing I thought was that it just ended like that, not without showing all the badges of the Hunger Games series. Not something I completely expected since I hadn't read the books.

Everything now revolves around Katniss and her attempts to be honest about The Hunger Games, and for that the people do attack the system, while the government attempts to suppress such natures. It got me intrigued by how the story might turn out, and how this government would go to extremes to eliminate such a threat and break down her resolve. It is an interesting story with quite extraordinary characters, waiting to see what would be the result of such actions. One thing that did confuse me was one twist at the end that I did not expect to see, but I think it was because it came a bit out of nowhere, more focused on seeing Haymitch and Katniss's reaction to her new found situation.

In terms of effects, I thought the mandrills were greatly improved compared to those "wolves" from last year (if you can call them wolves), and the actual centre of the Hunger Games concept was interesting keeping secrets in store for the Tributes, especially with a certain tree sticking out as an important point. Just an all-round improvement, nothing to complain about. (See what I mean by this being difficult to talk about? Gah nothing bad to note at all much!)

I think the overall problems I had was a bit of confusion by the twist, and the fact it ended sooner then I really thought it would, like with The Desolation of Smaug. Perhaps that was due to the pacing being good again. I didn't particularly feel that scenes were too quick or too slow for my liking, nothing felt unnecessary. Still, would have been nice for some feeling of an ending instead of simply ending on Katniss's look. I know that people say that plot details in books aren't always included in film, but what they forget is that books and films are different mediums. You can explain all you want in books and allow what has been said to settle in. With film, 2 to 2 and a half hour to explain everything is a slight pain, and really can't be done. Maybe something can be included from Mockingjay to just have some sort of resolution? Just a thought.

You try that here, one of your characters must die. It is Martin's Law

Catching Fire is a good follow-up to The Hunger Games. Everything is upped just a bit, making everything look big in comparison. Note I say Big, not bigger. In my mind at the minute is the idea that if a sequel becomes bigger, you might push too far to make the sequel better then the first, and end up losing where to go for the threequel should it come along. Catching Fire does that to a good extent. The characters bring a bit more intelligence to their situations, but don't lose any sort of emotions or development, which is helped by the acting at some points, especially with Jennifer Lawerence's great acting style. And speaking of said Lawrence...........

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
And Number 1:

Silver Linings Playbook


Now this is a little bit of a surprise for me for this to be anywhere on list at all, let alone watching it. But quite honestly, Silver Linings Playbook made me feel quite a draw of emotions. I was laughing, shocked, and smiling by the film's end. There was something about this story that just felt....perfect.

The film centres on Pat Solitano Jr (Bradley Cooper) coming out of a mental health institute to move back in with his parents Robert De Niro and Jacki Weaver, determined to get his wife Nikki back into his life after an incident that he keeps repeating in his mind. He finds a route of communication through a friend's wife's sister called Tiffany (played by Katniss Everdeen) and she agrees, in exchange for him partnering her in a dance competition. Along the way, he gets slightly involved with his dad's good luck charms in American Football (whom is trying to open a restaurant) and goes to a therapist for treatment.

As I've said, this film surprised me to no end. Pat Jr suffers from bi-polar disorder and seeing him act the way he does is interesting and shocking at the same time. One scene in particular that shocked me was a quick moment of conflict between him and his parents. I won't spoil what happens, you should watch it for yourself. Bradley Cooper's performance in that role was really good, as far as I remember. He just seemed to be quite fantastic as a determined man who just wants to get his life back to the way it was.

Tiffany is a fascinating character, and looking back on Jennifer Lawrence's Oscar win for the role, I could see why. She is a powerhouse, equally determined but also you could see she really wanted to help Pat out, or so we think. You could really see the innocence and probably guiltiness at the same time as the film unravels what happens between the two characters. I can't think off the top of my head who could have played that part better then Lawrence in any way. Again, no spoilers.

Her impression of Kirsten Stewart in the diner scene was what won her the part

Like The Hobbit again, this film focuses more on the characters, how so determined they are to try and find their own peace of mind, Pat Jr with his wife, his father with opening an restaurant, and Tiffany...well spoilers again. But as the film pans out you see how their choices change throughout and how the initial conflicts actually seem to affect those choices in how they do things. It is essentially a character study on the face of it, but it's done right as an emotional ride through those who are simply different minded to us. They have mental health problems, but they are still human of course. That shouldn't be ignored.

I wasn't sure what to expect before watching this film. All I had was the knowledge of suggestion and Jennifer Lawrence's Oscar win. Now I do think this is one of the best films I've seen ever, and would more than willingly watch again if someone asked me to. Silver Linings Playbook gave me a good deal back in return for what I'm saying now about it. If you haven't seen it, I would suggest to see it now. Stop whatever it is you're doing and get this brought, rented, interwebbed, whatever.  Just watch it. It is a film that is NOT to be missed!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

So that's the first article of the year complete! I hope you have enjoyed my choices and think I'm onto something. Then again I'm always onto something. Cocaine for starters. Just prepare for February girls and boys. It's only going to get more random then ever!

Randomizer out!
I don't know about you.......But I take comfort in those films


No comments:

Post a Comment