Saturday, 25 May 2013

Psychopathic Rabbits and Transvestite Chicks

Hello one and all! Welcome back to the Randomizer As you will remember, it's been a fortnight since I wrote my Margaret Thatcher article, to some supportive comments from friends on Facebook. Since that time I have been focusing on my book writing to make up with the length of time I took with the article. But now normal service should be resumed right.

So I've been thinking now to just lower the tone a little bit and talk about rabbits. Yep, rabbits. They are quite the annoyingly cute kind of animal aren't they? So lovely, probably nice to cuddle, always hopping about in the countryside and breed as fuck. And as Watership Down tells us, they actually have their own language called Lapine. Whether this makes as or more intelligent then dolphins remains to be seen (I prefer that because if dolphins were so intelligent, wouldn't they be saying we're awesome?)

But there is a TV show about rabbits partaking in crazy adventures ranging from simply being in a police jail to going through the floors of a department store and going into a forest. And it's made in Japan. Make of that what you will. And this is called: Usavich.


A show that is for those of a specific taste, it's a silent comedy (albeit some speaking roles from few characters) with a lot of slapstick moments, facial expressions that add to the comedy, and even transvestite chickens! Not something you see everyday, unless you're on Youtube most of the time. It is a strange series at times because of the surreal situations that open up before you. But personally I find it enjoyable. I keep bringing myself back to it and I can't explain why! Maybe it's because I find it a guilty pleasure in its inherent silliness. Oddly enough, the series does have Russian elements in it, if not being set entirely in Russia! Well, if vodka isn't the give-away I don't know what is.

I first came across this show when I went down to the Steel City (or Sheffield as it's more commonly known) for a friend's birthday do and the first place we hit was a little rock place called West Street Live. Unfortunately it was akin to the 80s club Reflex in York, in that it was where all the old people congregated and it was soooo crowded. Urgh. But one thing stopped me from going mental in that place and it was Usavich, playing on the TV screens in the place. I remember being so bemused by it that I kept it in my mind despite drinking to forget (mostly from West Street Live :P). And I have been keeping up to date with it for the most part, or at least trying to. It does come from Japan, so videos of recent seasons are hard to come by.

Currently there are four seasons to watch on Youtube, with season 5 still currently being shown on different channels all over the place. So after I've finish discussing the series with you lovely people, hopefully you will go watch it and be either become a fan, or just think it's mentally insane. Which it is, but that's not the point.
So here we go with talking about Usavich.

-------------------------------------------------------------
First, let's talk characters.

The two main characters of the series are called Putin (Ha!) and Kirenenko. Both of them wear near identical prison clothes, with different colour schemes to differiate between them (Putin wears green and Kirenenko wears red).

Putin (Ha!) is a playful, yet so innocent creature who gets caught up in troubling events in the first place. He is also a very bad lightweight; anything alcoholic drink he has turns him drunk.


He's not hopelessly naive though, as his mechanical skills do help get him and Kirenenko get of tough situations. And he is a cook too, as long as no one fucks up the cooking (which can happen behind his back).

Kirenenko on the other hand is the complete opposite. He was part of the Mafia along with his twin brother Killnenko, but was sent in prison and shared a cell with Putin (Ha! Sorry I'll stop doing that). He is a quiet rabbit and likes everything in order. But if one crosses a line, he gets angry and promptly beats them up. And if he pushed too far, he goes into RAGE MODE and destroys those who did the pushing.


He is also a character who does not die easily, since he has been:
·         Poisoned
·         Shot
·         Near-beheaded
·         And possibly clubbed.

But it's not impossible to kill him and on a few occasions that has exactly happened whether by Putin accidently, or drug intake or even sliced in half. However he is revived easily as well if quick about it.
He also has an obsession with sneakers, which is what covers the finale of season 1, and the whole of seasons 2 and 3. But this obsession does lead to some revelations of his past in the season 3 finale. The villain in that season,  Zuruzorofu (try saying that 3 times) had met Kirenenko and Killnenko beforehand. And was the original orchestrator in blowing them up! Luckily the twins were repaired and continued leading the mafia. Well Killnenko did since Kirenenko was in jail.

The two main characters are joined pretty early in Season 1 by the first sub-character, a transvestite baby chick called Comaneci, who really does nothing but gets eaten and attempts to look pretty. 


He's just there to get all the abuse :P. Whenever he sees his mother (possibly father) he cries at the prospect of a reunion! Which goes well. Actually it doesn't, the mother gets cooked in some fashion. He does get killed on a few occasions, but like Kirenenko he does come back to life. In season 4, he even gives birth to his own chick and dies straight after, becoming a ghost. He gets deserted by the crew, until he finds them in the forest. Where strangely enough, he merges with his chick into an egg and reborn. Believe me, it's the only part in the series I find strange. These chickens must like inbreeding or something.

The second character who joins two episodes after Comaneci is a frog called Leningrad, who also does nothing much other then eat Comaneci and croak. 


I say much, because in every 5th episode he sets off a musical trend that lasts for the whole duration of that episode. Other than that, he just sits around. His family lives in the forest in Season 5, consisted of his mother Sharapova and his father. Not sure if Sharapova is meant as an insult or just a comedic factor. We don't get much detail about his father except for the fact he eats anything.

The last character to join the group is the robot Mekanenko, introduced 2/3rds of the way through in season 3. 


He was built by Putin fast after Zuruzorofu (still saying that 3 times?) sent troops to kill them. He manages to scare them off, but subsequently shocks Putin and a resurrected Kirenenko for fun. The whole of Season 4 revolves around him and putting his mechanical side to good use as many things such as a washing machine, video game machine, video phone and simply cleaning the windows. Unfortunately in the penultimate episode, he gets beaten up by RAGE MODE Kirenenko and sent in the trash. But he was rebuilt into the duo's car and driven off into the forest.

These characters are probably the reason WHY I keep watching them so much. They are superbly silly, surreal and sadistic in a cartoon sort of way. It's like the Japanese equivalent of Loony Tunes or Tom and Jerry, so over-the-top in a good way. If I had to pick a favourite one, Kirenenko would be it. I enjoy his violent streak and how he can come out on top even if everything is against him. And his facial expressions are simple: calm, angry, RAGE MODE. It's how he lives his life. I wouldn't mind a Kirenenko plushie actually (my birthday is tomorrow ;) I don't mind waiting :D ). Also I do love the Google Translation that is given on the Usavich site: Not interesting in Putin sharing at all. I think I wouldn't too.

-----------------------------------------------
Now I'm going to do a Season-By-Season review, which does not come as spoiler-free. If you wish to avoid seeing these, then you may skip ahead! Otherwise, if you're interested in what happens, you have been warned.

Season 5 will not be included as to my knowledge, there is no complete version on Youtube. So unfortunately it will not be graced with us tonight. Also I don't think each of the seasons even do have a specific name, though the episode titles do. So for unofficial purposes, I'll be using the episode titles for the Season name.

Season 1- Time for....


The first season is set in prison, where Putin and Kirenenko go about their prisons lives in relative steadiness. They are constantly looked on by The Prison Guards, yellow rabbits that hide behind doors and give the prisoners their food, showers and exercise regimes. Don't worry, Kirenenko has his daily beating up sessions with them. In the finale, Kirenenko comes across some sneakers in his magazine and decides to go get them. By breaking out of the prison. Make sense, I don't think the Prison Guards would want to see him again! Putin instinctively follows him into a car and they drive off for their adventure on the road.

Animation wise, it has good points and bad. The only bad thing is, it does feel clunky at times like when Putin is doing his cosack dance on his bed at the start of most episodes. But for the most part, it is pretty awesome. The things that do really stand out are the fast-paced moments. The musical episode is so enjoyable as it brings a lot of comedy out with fly-swatting and the dancing which are superbly done! And whenever Kirenenko gets angry, the pace is sped up fast.

The designs are pretty good, and make everything seem huger. Kirenenko is a brilliant example because as he becomes more angry, you can clearly see what will happen. And his RAGE FACE is fantastic. At the moment it comes on screen, you can pretty much see how screwed everyone is. The deep yellow eyes, the fanged mouth, the red centre in his mouth; It is a face to fear. And love at the same time.  Though whether he holds up with the cute Killer Rabbit from Monty Python and the Holy Grail, we'll have to wait and see.

And now we come to cultural references. Like Penises. I'm not making this up, honest! There are lots of penis gags (OK, too far!) in the show. In episode 4, the guard actually has a water spray placed conveniently right at the bottom of his door and takes pleasure at spraying Putin at one point. At least the water wasn't yellow........did I just write that? Oops.  I don't know if it was meant to make it a real world kind of situation where rabbits have a Johnson on their person, but it's because Japanese animators have always had a thing for making graphic depictions of situations. It's happened in Yu-Gi-Oh, Hayao Miyazaki films and even Pokemon (which strangely enough caused a real-life graphic depiction with the banned Porygon episode). Watching the penis references will be a kind of distraction for Western audiences because we don't see those references anyway on TV or anything (apart from Game of Thrones to be fair, they're always flying around). On the plus side, the penis jokes are less referred to in later seasons so you may carry on in peace.
As I've said before, most of the humour comes from the character's personalities and they are very good in this season. The way they're introduced at the start gives you from the off the impression of what they are like.

Putin is pretty naive to the core, like when he's opening all those colourful doors only to reveal the implementations of death behind them. He's kind of like George in Blackadder Goes Forth, unbelievably optimistic and happy with life. But of course like the fish slapping him in the face, he gets a great amount of abuse thrown at him.

Kirenenko probably isn't as psychopathic to begin with, but he is pretty angry and provokes some great reactions from the guards, like bricking up the wall whenever he lets loose. He practically owns them in every respect. And that's kind of a problem I have with the guards themselves. They are pretty stupid with handling him and are really the ones that reveal how invincible Kirenenko really is with their incompetence. There's nothing wrong with that because they do create a good foil to him, but I don't consider them very rememberable.

Finally, the music. The main theme that appears is so bland and uninteresting. It's really just a standard introduction and setting tone. Though I suppose if you think about it, it's probably used right when nothing is actually happening. When finally the action occurs, the tone is amped up quickly and does add to the moment well. Kirenenko has his own simple bass beat theme and it sounds good, but I don't think it matches his character perfectly. Unlike his RAGE MODE, which does include the sound of an electronic alarm blaring out as a warning of ass-kicking ahead.

The first season is a good starting point, but some bits bring it down a notch sadly from making it perfect. There are a few good episodes to check out like the musical one and the penultimate one where the RAGE MODE is there for to all. It's a harmless tale and does a good job in setting up the story arcs for the coming seasons ahead...


Season 2- Watch for....



On the road, Putin and Kirenenko come across their new villains for the season, Boris (left) and Kopuchefu (right.....Why couldn't he have Vlad or something?) who try to capture them, with varying failures that involve them either being smashed or blown up, even somehow being forced to drag the car along! Only Kirenenko could do that! Putin makes some modifactions to the car by adding new tyres, a airplane engine (courtesy of you-know-who) and some armour to it. Kirenenko in the mean-time reads his magazine and goes on the war path when it gets destroyed. They finally end getting to the big city, after an all-out brawl with the police.
The animation does get better in this season! The expressions especially with Putin are priceless you go through the season. The final episode delivers one of the best pieces, and everything gets thrown at you! The police cars chasing them is hilarious, Kirenenko taking every single of them down is brilliant and even though his RAGE MODE is glimpsed briefly, it's a good sight to see.

Design wise, cars and tanks and airplanes take a lot of precedence here. And some of them are pretty cool. The car Putin and Kirenenko drive in is not very interesting, but with the modifications added later it becomes pretty sweet to have as a ride. All the police ones however are cool off the bat. The army tank they use is very well done and turns like a beauty, so much better than their police one.

I must admit, one thing that threw me off was Leningard wearing red pants. .....just why? As I'll explain later, it's not the best look to have, especially on a frog. It's the one thing I'd consider a major design issue. On the other hand, it might be part of the surreal world that makes it strangely unique, if you get what I mean. But personally...I'm not entirely sure. It jsut feels awkward.

On a higher note, the villains are so much better than the prison guards. No matter how hard they get their asses handed to them, they do not give up and continue to persist in their capture of the duo. Of course they fail but it's all done spectacularly. They also keep pushing up the ante somehow via means of rocket launchers, machine guns and the tanks as I've talked. They get so desperate to capture them and still they fail. I think this way around, their incompetence works to  And their theme tune as they appear is pretty awesome. A long 'waaaah' sound before hitting into the fast beat. Trust me, it is THAT AWESOME.

As comedy goes, it is very funny. Kirenenko as we find is a bit lazy, but I'm not knocking that at all. He does things his own way, and his attacks on Boris and Kopuchefu are freaking excellent. But Putin has his fair share of moments too, as he actually manages to bring pieces of the car together and like I said his reactions are great. Like when Kirenenko actually dies at one point, Putin just turns blue and screams, eyes nearly bulging out. The musical episode is on par with Season 1's, and it might actually make you laugh more and perhaps also make you appreciate it more. Finally, Kirenenko keeps punishing Comaneci for being anywhere near his shoes. And it is pretty funny for the most part, revealing how Kirenenko feels about his sneakers as well. Don't fuck with Kirenenko kids.

This season is much better then Season 1 and you'd probably see why. Everything is tweaked to make it that much better. And there is a lot of character development, more so for Putin probably with his mechanical side being revealed as pretty handy and Kirenenko caring only for his collection of sneakers. That's probably the most surprising thing, that you learn a bit of the characters in this season and how they can actually, for lack of a better word, NEED each other for their situations. It's never spoken out at all, but you can sort of see it before your eyes. I wonder what the next season might reveal for us...

Season 3-Floor Number...

Kirenenko and Putin stop by a mafia run building, disguised as a department store, so Kirenenko can get the sneakers he found in the magazine. But Zuruzorofu, our next villain is more the kind to kill on sight. So the duo climb through the 13 floors of the store to get the shoes. After a death experience and failures at getting the shoes, the group manage to get to the top. By bringing it down to them, thanks to Kirenenko's RAGE MODE. Kirenenko gets the shoes and Zuruzorofu is arrested by the old antagonists Boris and Kopuchefu, wrapping up mostly all the arcs and the gang live happily ever after.

Again, the animation is impressive even though it's less complex from season 2. A lot of things do happen in the blink of an eye, so you need to keep some attention to what's happening, but some bits like Kirenenko falling through the trap door and smashing the waiter onto the table are stunning to take in. The expressions used throughout are priceless again. Putin's reaction simply falling to his supposed death is fantastic, just a blank stare with the white face. You can't help but laugh at that. Well I can't, I don't know about you. And Zuruzorofu's expressions are good too, seeing how Kirenenko does these impossible things against him. As for the annual musical episode, it was on par with its predecessors. It felt quite a seamless creation where everything just fitted right, and the music itself is enjoyable to listen. There is a nice-call back to the fish slapping from the first episode which gets a good laugh.

Design wise, thank GOD Leningrad had that blue and white stripy top with the blue shorts. Still weird, but not as weird as having just red underwear on. You do get used to it over time. And the minions costumes are good too. Though they do look as if they're wearing gimp masks. Maybe they read 50 shades of disturbed people and thought: 'fuck this I want the real experience'. But I digress. The numbers on their uniforms are a nice touch too. Though some of the gangster rabbits you see hanging around the building are hit and miss. Some of them look cool, but some just look just weird. And I must say, I do have a little soft spot for the afro rabbit in episode 5. He pulls that look off well!

Our villain Zuruzorofu is pretty good, but maybe not as good as Boris and Kopuchefu. He is also a little shit at that, making sure Kirenenko does not get the star sneakers he so desperately wants. And the ways he does that is just as psychopathic as Kirenenko. But he doesn't do a lot under his weight, usually letting his minions do the work. He was quite clever, but his plans always somehow back-fired on him in unlucky manner, so I won't knock him too much. Mostly, I feel that he is not a stronger villain than Boris and Kopuchefu and less enjoyable, possibly because he is a bit of a weakling. Boris and Kopuchefu did things with their own hands, while Zuruzorofu just laid back.

There are two bit of music I like to talk about. First, a romantic piece whenever Kirenenko comes across the sneakers in episodes 6 and 12. I can guess on first viewing, it sounds weird. You wouldn't expect a piece to appear in a series such as this. And it still sounds weird anyway, but in a good way. On the other hand, it does match up with Kirenenko pretty well. His love for the sneakers is undisputed and he doesn't want to part himself away from them. It is a pretty good tune to use for those moments.

The second is from the penultimate episode as well, when Kirenenko goes into RAGE MODE. It sounds AWESOME!! As Kirenenko literally brings the department store down, the music is one of the best pieces in the entire series! It is an angry song and you can very well see why. Kirenenko is not going to stop until he gets those shoes and SMASHES those floors OUT OF THE BUILDING.

There are a lot of laughs guaranteed in this season as much as season 2. The way Putin flaunts himself after he drinks alcohol, and being not very good at keeping it down is good. The way Mekanenko just fucks around with everything in sight is good. And you get the usual bits like Leningrad constantly eating Comancei, even though he was turned into a ghost from poisonous fumes. The moments are pretty close and make for enjoyable viewing. Though in a way, the series is slightly tamer then in Season 2. There is still obviously the degree of violence and surreal moments, but they're kept more at a steady pace.

Season 3 is enjoyable, but not as much as Season 2 was. Zuruzorofu is a weaker villain than Boris and Kopuchefu despite his reactions to the situations happening before him. Everything else is on par, with having some great moments of action and comedy. I would say that in a way, this is Kirenenko's defining moment....well maybe I'll push that up a bit, Kirenenko's defining SEASON! It revolves around him a lot and his successful journey at getting the damn sneakers from the end of season 1. Putin gets some good moments too, but doesn't get in the way so much. And most of the story arcs are cleared up....apart from what to do with Mekanenko? Next season!

Season 4- ....Machine


This final season I will cover plays out similarly like Season 1, because they are in the same location and it centres around Mekanenko most of the time. There are some great situations where Mekanenko pretty much fucks everyone around on different occasions, like when being a washing machine and cooking all the food. Kirenenko puts him in his place sometimes, and uses him for his own fun. But when Mekanenko actually PUTS on the sneakers and rips them, Kirenenko goes into RAGE MODE and kicks his ass. But before long they are discovered by Boris and Kopuchefu and are forced to escape into the forest.

Let's talk about Mekanenko to start with. He is a cool character in his own right and quite enjoyable silly. He has his own bitchy and malfunctioning personality, making him different besides looking like Kirenenko. The humour he brings to the table is good to get laughs of the people because even though Putin makes him into different machines, he still has two screws short of a plasma TV. In the penultimate, he does the most gravous sin ever in the show: he puts on the star sneakers. And Kirenenko's reaction? RAGE MODE!!! Duly dumping him in the trash, but not before the two have a massive battle, and Mekanenko reveal his own RAGE MODE, which fails completely and Kirenenko kicks his ass. In design terms, it is a cool design to have (especially as I've noticed just yesterday that he even has a plug tail. Sweeeeet). It is a 90 per cent look to Kirenenko, albeit with some different ears and green eyes and the robotic claws. Good Character, not much bad I can say about him.

Animation is enjoyable still. It still holds a kind of simplicity from season 3, but some visuals are quite complex to have done like with Mekanenko's lasers and his vacuuming sucking everything inside. I noted earlier that this season was probably similar to Season 1. And.....yes, I think so. Nothing really happens, there's no enemy to confront (those guards are not villains, just annoying occurrences), just everyday antics involving the duo and their robot fucking about. There's not much fast paced business now, so the animation takes it time and doesn't rush things, giving it a more slow easy time to let the episodes flow. Oddly, I do think that there are fewer expressions done throughout the series.

Musical Episode = Still enjoyable. Next!

Most of the humour does come from Mekanenko and Putin just fucking about with each other. Kirenenko is put to one side for most of the season, until forcibly brought into these different situations by Mekanenko. Which I don't think is shameful much. His story arc is pretty much over for the time being, so all he does is beat up Mekanenko up and makes him work to his advantage and fun. The series is still funny, and I hope you'll laugh with it as much as I have.

Though there are some strange moments again, like in Washing Machine. Comancei has grown up and Mekanenko takes his clothes off to wash and reveals...a thong. Yep, you read that right, a thong. It is a startling sight to see before you and you will either laugh at it, or just think 'wtf is that?'. I'm the latter in all honesty. Maybe it's a cultural reference in Japan that threw me off it, but meh. It's there and I'm still watching the series. No reason not to.

Season 4 is probably the quietest of the lot but by no means is it the weakest. It has genuine funny moments, good set-ups and a very good ending (with Boris and Kopuchefu making a return carrying wanted posters for Kirenenko). You still got your usual bits with Leningrad and Comancei (including his son, Comancei Jr) and Mekanenko is still part of the team, now modified into the car itself and taking the duo into the forest, where Season 5 takes place....

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What else can I say about Usavich that hasn't been said? It's an enjoyable series to watch, but admittedly it is something that won't get everyone's attention. It's an acquired taste, only for those who have a cartoonish over-the-top surreal humour. Watching the series again in a more critical light, I still enjoy the over-the-top appeal it has. The setting is surreal yet fantastic, the characters ridiculous yet hilarious. And I enjoy the fuck out of it so much and will continue to do so for the while yet.

There is one final thing that I will say. I have wondered whether this kind of series would be acceptable for people who are on the autistic spectrum?

I say this because of a survey done by the National Autistic Society on Thomas the Tank Engine. Wow. Thomas the Tank Engine and Usavich in the same article. Who would've thought it? Anyway, I remembered reading this article, and falling back to it I saw this piece:

Most interesting perhaps is the learning of facial expressions and emotions mentioned spontaneously by 8% of parents. Even when a child with autism speaks, their 'communication' is often poor because of the missing 'theory of mind' - understanding people and their thoughts and emotions. The suggestion from this research is that Thomas helps children with autism to build up some basic 'theory of mind' knowledge.
(Children with Autism and Thomas the Tank Engine, National Austic Society)

So it's said that Thomas the Tank Engine helped autistic children understand what the different range of emotions look like and build up that awareness to help them in later life.

Usavich is like this in a similar way, because of the facial expressions mainly used. Kirenenko's expressions are pretty basic: calm, anger, and RAGE MODE. Putin likewise shows the more different range of emotions, like happiness, shock, tiredness and faint etc. Those expressions help in the humour of the show and could attract autistic people to watching it.

Another similar way is the distinctive clothing that the main characters have, specifically the prison stripes. Kirenenko's colour is red, while Putin's colour is green. So it could help understand about colours as well. Though I have to admit, that is as far as that goes since all the other characters don't have specific colours with which to match the character and could confuse autistic people.

So possibly as a theory, Usavich might be something used to help autistic people in the same manner as Thomas the Tank Engine in future. Obviously for a more adult audience, I'm not exactly sure a psychopathic rabbit is a good role model for 10 year olds. But if anyone wants to take that idea on, come back to me with the results!
---------------------------------------------------------
And that is it for this edition of The Randomizer.

A couple days ago, I felt quite foolish since I never put up any contact details or such so you guys can send me messages to show what the Randomizer means to you. If you have any queries, comments or any other tidbits you'd like to mention, send an e-mail to:


I will try to reply back as soon as I can. For now, goodbye. Until the next fortnight, keep out of trouble, and remember:

Don't fuck with Kirenenko!

Saturday, 4 May 2013

The Iron Lady


Welcome back to the Randomizer!

I apologise for the delay in uploading this article, but with covering shifts at work, it has been difficult to try and keep focus on working with this at the same time. But now it is complete.
--------------------------------------------------------------------
As I said three weeks ago in light of recent events, my topic for this article will look into Margaret Thatcher. What does the name mean to you?

Does it stir feelings of greatness and patriotism when she beat the Argentineans to reclaim the Falklands, how she gave people the opportunity to buy council houses to make their own homes, and how she overcame the male dominated society of Parliament to be Britain's first female Prime Minster?

Or does it stir hatred and resentment, how she closed down the mining industry and put many a community out of work as well as taking on the trade unions, how she tried to force through the legendary Poll Tax, causing a massive riot in the centre of London, and finally how she set a trend of privatisation for businesses around the country?

Even after her death over three weeks ago, she will always provoke great emotions inside people. Watching the news a few days after her death, I saw images of students and people my age celebrating and dancing in squares and such. Now I can understand people from that time celebrating because they were there when she destroyed the miners. But those students? They might know about what she did, but I don't think they have the right because they were young. I know some things that she did, but I had no cause to celebrate her death.

So what will I look at today? Firstly I shall give some background information on her life and what she did politically as well as some other tidbits. Second, I will look at some of the most important events to crop up in her political career which affected the nation. And Thirdly I will ask the question: What was Margaret Thatcher?

This will be as important to me as it is to you because this is a journey of trying to understand the woman herself and how the country she ran for over 10 years is still deeply divided after her time in power and also trying to understand how she kept bringing Jimmy Saville over for Christmas (to be honest who would?)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Margaret Hilda Roberts (or more widely known as Meryl Streep to her friends) was born in Grantham in 1925.

When she came to Oxford University in the 1940s to study chemistry, she became part of the Oxford University Conservative Association, rising to be president. After she graduated, she tried finding work as a research chemist in Essex (well that explains why she went mad then. Essex....no). But she still found time to put herself forward as the Conservative candidate for Dartford in the 1950 and 1951 elections. She lost both times because it was a safe Labour seat.

(Yes Minster Dictionary: Safe = LOL you have no chance)

Two months after she lost in the 1951 elections, she married Denis Thatcher and threw herself in training to become a lawyer. A couple years later, she gave birth to the twins Carol and Mark. Thatcher (Margaret, not Denis in case that caused confusion) did qualify to become a barrister, but still took a foray into politics. In the 1959 elections, she won the seat at Finchley and entered into government for the first time under Harold Macmillan (Supermac to his chums). Presumably a back-bencher at first, her first posting was Junior Minster for Pensions in 1961. It didn't last since Labour won in the 1964 elections and she had to shuffle off to the Shadow Side of Parliament.

(Yes Minster Dictionary: Shadow Side of Parliament = The losers of the last election. They sit on the right hand side on your TV screens whenever stations show Parliament in session. HA right hand side....).

In 1967, Thatcher became part of the Shadow Cabinet under Edward Heath and rose to become Shadow Education Secretary. She took the post full-time when the Conservatives took power in 1970.
Now this is the start of a few barrels of laughs and probably the start of how Thatcher became hated, by children of all people. In an attempt to cut spending (as Conservatives have an unrelenting habit of), Thatcher controversially stopped free milk for primary school pupils aged 7-11. This gave her the unofficial popular title of 'Thatcher the Milk Snatcher' and sent children making their own banners and marching on Parliament to get their milk back! .................That would be a great image if true.

But in those early years of the 1970s, Thatcher was one of many spokes in the wheel of disaster for the Conservative government. In the country, unemployment was at one million and the trade unions were gaining strength. Heath tried to curb this but failed, and the unions rose against him. In addition, the working miners' organised strikes in '72 and '74 over pay issues. The latter was particularly devastating because it led to the infamous Three-Day-Week. Heath called a general election, asking 'Who governs Britain?' Answer: 'Not you'. Heath resigned as prime minister and Labour under Harold Wilson took over.

During that time, Thatcher also said she believed that there won't be a female prime minister in my lifetime. Oh the irony. A year after they lost the election, Thatcher challenged Heath for the leadership and defeated him in the first round of balloting. Heath resigned soon afterwards and in the second round, Thatcher won an outright majority and become leader of the Galactic Empire.....oh sorry the Conservative Party. Easy to get those two mixed up.

During the next four years, Labour over saw a complete slump in the country, eventually leading to 'The Winter of Discontent'. Jim Callaghan (the only member to hold all top 4 jobs at given times) had said that the country was not in chaos because he didn't believe they existed. He has never had a mid-life crisis apparently. The Sun responded with their famous slogan: "Crisis? What Crisis?" After a vote of no confidence, Callaghan was forced to call an election.

(Yes Minister Dictionary - The Winter of Discontent = See Stark family motto for reference)

Thatcher used the slogan 'Labour Isn't Working' in her campaign to help disintegrate any hope of Labour keeping power. After the Winter of Discontent, the people swung to her. Thatcher won the election, gaining over 60 seats in the process and became Britain's first female Prime Minister, just like she said she wouldn't. Whoops. On the steps of Number 10 Downing Street she quoted Saint Francis of Assisi, saying:

Where there is discord, may we bring harmony. Where there is error, may we bring truth. Where there is doubt, may we bring faith. And where there is despair, may we bring hope

Irony that her premiership ended with such problems.

At the start of her tenure, she privatised businesses and raised the interest rates in an effort to subdue inflation. But at a cost: Unemployment rose to 2 million and riots broke out in Brixton with the allegation of police brutality against a black youth. Thatcher's government become increasingly unpopular. But there were two significant events that turned everything around.

First was the Iranian Embassy Siege in 1980. Six men held 26 staff hostage in the embassy for six days, killing one after their demands were not met. Thatcher's deputy at the time Willie Whitlaw approved the use of SAS forces to storm the embassy and save the hostages. The attack was a great success. Five of the terrorists were killed and one captured. Thatcher herself congratulated the troops for their success, visiting their barracks.

But her next event was a triumph that trumped the siege. It was of course, the Falklands War. Argentinean forces under the military junta of General Galteri invaded the Falkland Island with the claim it is theirs by right. Thatcher responded with a 'Get the fuck off my islands' and sent a task force to recapture them. Both sides gained certain victories over the other. ARA General Belgrano was torpedoed and sunk by HMS Conqueror in controversial circumstances. A couple days later, HMS Sheffield was hit by an Exocet missile and sunk. In the end, the British Army landed on the islands and crossed to Port Stanley. On the 14th of June, the Argentinean force surrendered.

The victory boosted Thatcher's popularity greatly and she called a general election for the next year. The Tories once more trounced Labour and Thatcher easily secured a second term against Michael Foot (the Labour leader at the time). Her second term proved more controversial then the first, and it could be considered to be the trigger for the great divide when it came to her.

1984 was a busy and near fatal year for the 'Iron Lady'. After she was elected, she appointed Ian McGregor (yes, the same McGregor that tried to get Peter Rabbit. The swine!) as head of the National Coal Board. As reputations go, his was for cutbacks and closures when he was managing British Steel. And closures and the mining industry obviously went hand in hand!

In that year of 1984, The National Coal Board set about the motions of closing down 20 mining pits around England, Scotland and Wales, a loss of 20,000 jobs. So what did the miners do? .......do leaves grow on trees? The miners erupted. Strikes around the country combined into a National Union of Miners Strike in March, under the leadership of one Arthur Scargill. This wasn't just a class struggle, it was a war.

For close to a year, the two sides fought each other verbally and physically. Picket lines became commonplace, and some places like Orgreave became a kind of battlefield as police and miners clashed. But at times, the miners even fought themselves, as some who were called 'scabs' went back to work and were attacked for their trouble. A few actually died during the strike. One man David Wilkie, a taxi driver who drove the non-striking miners to work, was even killed in the south of Wales where miners were hit hard. These events, along with those going back to work, put an end to the strike in March 1985. Thatcher had done what Edward Heath couldn't do over ten years prior: Defeat the miners.

However a few months beforehand, the miners possibly could have won thanks to the IRA. In October, Thatcher was down in Brighton for the Conservative Party Conference at the Grand Hotel. While working on her speech, a bomb was detonated close to her room. She and Dennis survived, but five Tory party members lost their lives. The next morning, Thatcher attacked those who planned the bombing saying:

"All attempts to destroy democracy have failed".

(Yes Minister Dictionary - Above quote: Ha Ha, you suck I rule!)

Indeed, democracy rallied again years later in the 1987 election, and once more Thatcher was elected for a third time. According to Wikipedia and the BBC, unemployment was lowering to around 2 to 2.5 million people, but inflation was increasing.

And those last three years would sign the death knell (no pun intended) for her leadership. The popular (shit in those days) Community Charge Tax was fiercely unpopular as local council set the tax rates apparently to high levels and people marched in the streets once more in London of March 1990. Meeting with police and violence starting up, a full scale riot broke out. One woman was even knocked down and run over by mounted policeman. And on the same level of surprise, police ran away from the rioters. Such the like would not be seen again until the Riots of 2011.

And in those same three years, members of her Cabinet very slowly were eased out. Chancellor of the Exchequer Nigel Lawson resigned in conflict with her personal advisor and was replaced by Kermit the Frog, or John Major as he's more known. Michael Heseltine had buggered off a few years later over a disagreement with Westland Helicopters and would come back to haunt her. But it was Geoffrey Howe, Thatcher's own deputy prime minister, who would start off the end with his resignation on 1st November 1990. However, he gave his speech nearly a fortnight afterwards and told others to tend their loyalties (after being embarrassed by her so I've heard. Don't mess with Geoffrey Howe kids. He will END you!).

Michael Heseltine came back to challenge her for the leadership of the Conservative party, which Thatcher accepted. She won the first round of balloting, but it wasn't enough to secure a favourable position. And after consulting with each of her cabinet members, she resigned. As she left the house she had lived in for 11 years, she gave a teary farewell to the nation and walked to the car that would take her back to the life of a backbencher, possibly always thinking in the back of her mind that she had been betrayed. (She could always get cauldron out and cast spells for revenge? Then again, I don't think she would've liked the karma coming back onto her)

(Yes Minister dictionary - consulting = told to piss off and never come back).

In the years after her resignation, she released books and made speeches throughout the world, even at one point being followed by Nick Broomfield for a Channel 4 documentary. Her husband Denis died in 2003 after suffering from pneumonia. She attended close friend Ronald Reagan's funeral and called for the release of General Pinochet. Later it was revealed that she was suffering herself from dementia (and caused me to feel sympathy for her for the first time after watching that film. O_O). She had her portrait painted and a statue commemorated for her in the House.

With her death just over three weeks ago came a mixture of feelings. Miners celebrated (actually it was a double celebration that included Jimmy Saville as well), People poured tributes. Even George Osbourne shed a very very suspicious tear at her funeral. Should've met Glenda Jackson for a chat.

For many people, it could be said that the name Margaret Thatcher is double-sided, loved and hated, praised and vilified. So now is the time to look at some of the well-known events during her era and perhaps judge ourselves whether she is one or the other. Or even both.
---------------------------------------------------------------
·        'The Milk Snatcher'

The cutback of milk was the first controversy she encountered when on the front line of front bench politics. Milk was made readily available after the Second World War for school children up to the age of 18. And we all readily blame Thatcher for such a cancellation.

But interestingly enough I came across a report from the Independent newspaper on 9th August 2010, which stated that Thatcher actually OPPOSED the legislation of ending school milk but was forced into it by the Treasury. I assume the conversation was: "We want more money to lavish on our mansions where we can lodge in while we use 53 pounds a week. Thatcher, do your duty!".

According to the BBC news from 1st January 2001, Documents released under the 30-year rule revealed that Thatcher did have a negative view on ending school milk, but offered a compromise that it would be available in nurseries and primary schools. So it does seem that the 'Milk Snatcher' title is a tad harsh since she had to take most of the flack for such a decision. But it would be foolish to say her compromise shouldn't still incur some protests from parents, because she made the compromise in the first place. The milk was still taken away from school children.

What is also interesting to note is that under Harold Wilson a few years before, the milk for secondary school children was cut back. Though I would assume that they could always cope with not having the milk in school and could always have a glass at home if they so chose to. But for those in primary school, it could help them to develop their bones and bodies for later life and taught that milk is an essential ingredient.
Milk was the first of many problems for Thatcher in her time on the front. It surprises me that she isn't the first person to start the trend in cutting back the milk. But the controversy will remain as one of her 'issues' since she made the compromise in the first place. Even though she didn't want to, she made the decision in the end and it will stick to her like butter on toast.

·        The Falklands War:

Coming at a time when her popularity was shrinking as fast as Baldrick's brain, the Argentine invasion of the Falklands (the Mulvinas as they call it) gave her the opportunity to not back down from a country invading her sovereign territory by force. After all, it became her defining reputation to come out and fight against those she considered her enemies. It was a win-or-lose situation. But there are some points which lead people to believing Thatcher was a war criminal.

Around the islands was a 200 mile exclusion zone made by Britain, which lead to the controversial  talking point of sinking the General Belgrano. The ship itself was not in the exclusion zone at the time of its sinking, being 30 miles out of range. John Nott believed that it was right to do so because they were a threat to the taskforce sent out to fight. The Argentine response was outrage, apparently even using the UN charter and a ceasefire resolution in response. Bit strange that they aggressively invaded the islands yet use a UN resolution at a time like that. That's just me though.

According to the Telegraph from Boxing Day 2011, Major David Thorp was asked to complete an inquiry into the sinking by Thatcher herself. He claims that the Belgrano was re-positioning into the exclusion zone, as opposed to the Argentinean response at the time that the ship was returning to port. To me, it seems an odd decision. Why would the Belgrano try and move into the exclusion zone in the first place? An unlikely answer might be that recently, the Argentineans have said that the sinking of the ship was a legitimate act of war, though that could be considered a stretch because if the Argentineans knew they were close to the exclusion zone, why would they still make a move?

Vice Admiral Sir Tim McClement has said that militarily, it was the right thing to do. If any of the aircraft carriers had been sunk, then that would be damaging to the Navy and possibly end the taskforce's mission. He said that Sir Sandy Woodward (what a name!) was seeking out to end the threat by the Argentinean ships and a possible pincer movement: A case of eliminating the threat and succeeding.

But what is interesting to find is that there was no actual formality of declaration of war from either side. Seriously? Not one of them declared war on the other? Hmmm. Doesn't that mean that both sides just killed one another without the pretext for authorised conflict? This subject got waay too complicated. Doesn't this mean that in the long-run, the sinking of the Belgrano was unjustified because there was no formal declaration?

But apparently in The Official History of the Falklands Campaign: Vol. II: War and Diplomacy (try saying that fast three times), declaring a state of war has more ramifications then reading 50 Shades of Grey (notably the mighty predication of the book's release and subsequent madness ensuing in parents buying all sorts sex-toys and police cuffs and.....ok I'm stopping there before I destroy your imaginations. Sorry! ).

Anyway, Freedman (p.90) states that:
A British declaration of war in 1982, for example, would have immediate implications for all Argentines resident in or carrying business in British terrority. They could be subjected to a variety of restrictions, up to internment and the process could lead to the effective abrogation of all contacts involving Argentine nationals, and turn any trading with Argentina into a criminal offence, allowing for the seizure and requisitioning of Argentine merchant ships in British ports and the suspension of all bilateral treaties. There were about 1,000 Argentines with indefinite leave to stay in Britain and another 4,000 with limited leave, of whom 1,000 were registered with the police. The best assessment was that there was no serious risk of acts of sabotage or terrorism and so there were no security reasons to intern or expel them as this would require emergency legislation as well as invite reciprocal action against British citizens in Argentina

Short Answer: Argentina would have screwed and been screwed over.

Long Answer: If the British had declared a formal war against Argentina, it would have meant that Argentineans living in the UK would have been subjected to a loss of freedom in the country and any legal trading would have become abolished, along with the ripping up of treaties. Besides that, it was also claimed that the Argentines posed no threat to British security at home so there wouldn't have been a reason to send them away from Britain in the first place. If they had done so, then Argentina would have responded by doing the same.

So it seems the Argentinean Junta was only interested in getting the islands back and not has a full-out direct war with Britain. Likewise, Thatcher's only objective was to get the islands back. If either side had declared a war, it would have made the matter so much more complicated and possibly destructive than it needed to be.

Going back to the original question if the sinking of the Belgrano was justified, the answer is just as needlessly overbearing apart from the military side of things. Yes, it gave Britain breathing space from the Argentine forces strategically and eliminating a threat to the task-force specifically. It also apparently pushed the Argentine Navy back to the ports and take no further part in the war (eh?).

But there doesn't seem to be a rational explanation because of the complexity of how the war was fought. If the countries were in a state of conflict, then Britain would have had the right to sink the ship. But with the war being disputed over territories, it becomes impossible to give a straight answer in terms of looking at any kind of field. Also with the exclusion zone in place, it will remain controversial if the Belgrano's intended course WAS going into the zone in the first place.

And I should also mention the obvious point that the biggest number of men lost in a day in the war was from the sinking itself. 323 lives lost. Did so many lives need to be killed off in this circumstance? This was an aggressive dispute between two nations that will inevitably involved deaths of soldiers, but the way the Argentinean sailors were killed is not to be understated in anyway shape or form.

The sinking of the Belgrano will always remain a prolific talking point for those studying, conversing or essaying about the Falklands War. With the research I have done for this, I think the debate will still continue on for many years to come.  So the only answer I can give at the moment is this: Militarily the best move, but remains mysterious at best.

·        The Miner's Strike:

The one event that led to a great divide in the nation and in Thatcher herself, the effects of The Miner's Strike can still be felt today in different parts of the country. My dad was telling me how one mining village called Edlington had become a complete wasteland, presumably after the Yorkshire Main Colliery (coal mine) had closed down when the strike collapse. In fact it might not be surprising to note that many mining communities have lost more than the jobs that held them steady. They lost a way of life. In striking against the government, they were trying to fight against the encroaching death of their society. Instead after a year of fighting against the police and authority, their fate had become sealed.

Taking Yorkshire as an example at the beginning of the strike, it had 56 collieries open. As of this year, only TWO remain open, at Hatfield and Kellingley. I'm asking myself how much that does affect such a huge community. 54 coal mines shut over a 29 year period. How does that psychologically affect the mining community? I can only guess harder than anyone could possibly imagine. I can't begin to see how deep the scars go because I wasn't there to see it. All I have is the Internet and stories of the time to help paint, in blatant terms, not a pretty picture.

Earlier I mentioned that Thatcher had appointed Ian McGregor to Head of the National Coal Mining Board. Now what I'm about to say is quite a stretch. I have a theory that she had a chance to be the one to try and defeat the miners since Edward Heath couldn't do it twice, taking it by the horns.

According to Sky News, she believed a strike was coming inevitably. There even was a plan by Nicholas Ridley to curb strikes into the Government's favour, and suggested to: "import coal at short notice" (p.25).  On orders, McGregor stocked up on coal stocks in the power stations, ready for it to happen someday soon. So it might be that Thatcher wasn't just planning to defeat them, but also to make sure they were prepared to have what the miners could throw at them, and win comfortably without bending backwards to their demands, just like Heath had done a decade prior.

Of course, the miners would not go down without a fight. When the announcement of the closures came on 6th March, the NUM declared national strikes almost a week later. Soon, picketing became part of the miner's life as they opposed the government. But as the strike continued, eventually it became a class war. And the Battle of Orgreave paid testament to that.

On the 18th June 1984, Miners clashed with the police outside when the former picketed at the Orgreave Coking Plant, and violence ensued. Bricks and stones were thrown around, and the miners tried to attack lorries that had come to pick up the coal. In the end, over 90 miners were arrested and charged with rioting, though all were eventually acquitted and the police themselves were impeached for attacking the miners. Peter Mansell was interviewed by The Guardian, stating his experience of seeing an ambulance coming up to the miners:

We opened up to let them through - course we did, we're respectful people. But when the ambulances got to the other side, police got out from the ambulances, they attacked us with truncheons on one side and horses from the other side. We got absolutely hammered (The Guardian, 8th April 2013).

Says something about police brutality doesn't it? Arthur Scargill said that:

The intimidation and brutality that has been displayed are something reminiscent of a Latin American state

A month after the incident, Thatcher's fighting spirit this time was directed at what she called 'the enemy within'. As opposed to the enemy "without". Seriously, she said that in the speech. That's not a joke I made up. Much. This obviously helped turn the tide and help miners.....oh wait no that's probably bollocks.
So far it looks like ALL the miners were united under one banner. But as the strike continued, money became scarce among those striking. Their financial aspects had nearly disappeared and they had to make do with all sorts to make some money. Some groups of people decided that to keep welfare for themselves and family, they would take probably the only option open to them: going back to work.

As I've mentioned above, Scabs was a term used to describe those who didn't or gave up striking and went back to the pits. They became something akin to a coin. You either saw a traitor to the cause or a peaceful person. For many people who chose this, they were attacked for what was seen as a betrayal against the common foe. But there are stories that cut deep. Families were torn apart, friends going into different pubs etc. It puts a whole different perspective on how the miners divided against each other.

Neil Greatrex was interviewed by the BBC in 2004, saying:

When your father dies without speaking to you for six years, it shows it wasn't just those bastards in the NUM affected by the strike. He wouldn't speak because I was against Scargill, he would only speak through my brothers

This is a plain example of how the strike struck hard through family lines. Not speaking to a relative must have felt a lifetime. The divisions must still run through those communities like the Berlin Wall, as much as I can gather. So far, it makes me feel disturbed because it is a very terrible situation where everything you choose to do might turn your friends into your most deadly enemies. The lines were fraught all over the country. There are even attacks on the Nottinghamshire county miners for not participating in the strike, still to this day.

Yet as winter finally came (with Ned Stark's face plastered everywhere), more and more miners went streaming back to work. Tony Kearney's article Dispute That Tore Communities Apart for The Northern Echo states that:

...the NCB (National Coal Board) announced a £650 Christmas bonus for anyone returning to work. Around 900 men across the country took up the offer in the first week...At the start of November, 52,000 miners were at work at 101, by the end of the month there were 68,000 at 146 pits...(2009)

That looks a massive difference with the incentive of money bringing the miners back to work. Despite deaths happening in different parts of the country, the flood of men increased throughout that winter and by February 1985, the Coal Board declared that the majority of the miners had gone back to work.

Finally on March 3rd, the NUM met with the Trade Union Congress and with a narrow vote majority of 98-91 after a deadlock, the strike was over. The long war against the Government was lost. And Thatcher could celebrate another victory.

The Miner's Strike was probably something that was planned as a victory from the start for Thatcher's government; A class war on her terms. The miners themselves, it saddens me to say, had no chance of winning at all even when fighting for their jobs. With the onset of winter, it was inevitable that the miners would soon come back into the fold. Now in the near thirty years since, the mining communities have disintegrated and the NUM has declined into near obscurity as well. It could be more than easy to say that a way of life has simply died. It has been buried so many feet under and is unlikely to ever rise again.

For Thatcher (or insert miner's term for her), it must have been an emphatic victory. Or something like 'Yeah, whatever'. It's difficult to find information to what her reaction would be. But then again, we can imagine what it would be. The Miner's defeat was a definite change of air in industry from ten years prior. The government had re-asserted itself as the dominant power and it would not be easy to break again.

At the end of it all, what is the end result? I would definitely say that a way of life has been lost, because a miner's life brought some steady balance for himself and his family. Now that has disappeared, where are those people now? Have they found other jobs or have they sunk into the depths? That is I think where the anger lies. It was the blatant actions made against the miners that have caused such grievence. The loss of a steady job where people feel as if they have no more chances in life, no purpose to try and follow through. Thatcher's government did away with that, and offered no chance of reprise for them, nor would many governments do so even after near thirty years of pain.

From here on in, Thatcher would be known as the by-word for evil in mining communities for years to come, and probably for good reason too.

·        The Poll Tax:

This was the one event that signalled the ending for Thatcher's premiership: The Poll Tax. Or Coummunity Charge if you're a Thatcherite. Or a fuck you to everyone else. So how did such a tax cause many people to rise up against their decade long leader? Bear with me on this, my explanations might take a while.
The 'Rates' taxation system was in place so many years since time eternal. It worked when a specific amount was charged by the local authorities depending on the value of the house you lived in. This presumably included such immunities as rubbish collecting and buying essentials like food and drink, toiletries, electricity, and books. Books are good, don't you know.

The Poll Tax had its roots as far back to the 1970s, developing into this idea: Instead of charging tax depending on the value of the household, it would be charged per adult living in the house. If two adults were living in a house, it would include them in the system. The same goes for their children who haven't left the nest yet, like me (my day will come soon, I promise you that). Those exempt from the pay were students, pensioners and the unemployed, who paid a small amount and got a number of tax rebates. It was believed that the tax was an effort to get the public to pay for services the government provides.

Unfortunately, the Poll Tax fell flat on its face. On a hard ground. And it lost all its teeth. After being smacked repeatedly into the same ground by the people. Now there are a number of reasons for the Poll Tax ending up in intensive care for the rest of its life.

One of the biggest was: Not everyone could afford to pay such an amount. Say like a family is living in a council house, while an older couple lived in a bigger house. Who pays the amount then? The family because they have the more members living in, if their children had not left yet. It became a expensive expenditure since the burden of taxation fell onto them mostly, and it left people with the prospect of being worse off.
The Poll Tax was introduced in Scotland first a year before England and Wales. Some Tory MPs in Scotland thought it would be popular. Erm....this is in a country where Tories aren't very popular anyway I think. The Scottish were absolutely livid and protested against it, nursing some resentment from the Miner's Strike as much as those in England. It was the precursor to shifting events down south.

But before the Poll Tax was implemented, protests had started up in earnest. One planned demonstration took part in London on 31st March 1990. Up to 70,000 took part in the rally to Trafalgar Square, though it could be substantially between 70,000 and 200,000. The square itself became filled up quickly with hardly much space for probably two-thirds of the other protesters. The organisers had been denied in taking the protest to Hype Park.

Unfortunately, everything changed when some of the protesters took to a sit-down in Whitehall. After refusing police requests to move, the arrests began. Soon the police became pelted with missiles from the crowd, and just as quickly violence spread through to neighbouring areas, like Charing Cross and Pall Mall. After the initial stand-off, the police line retreated and came back with those in riot gear to charge the attacking protesters.

The protest soon gave way to the infamous Poll Tax Riots. Cars were up-turned and set alight, police vans were attacked, windows were smashed etc, the amount of violence that occurred cannot be understated. But the performance of the Police that day was disturbing. Police cars and vans drove through the crowds Mounted Policeman charged at the protesters, attacking them with whatever they had, even knocking and running over a woman. The riots continued on throughout the evening and night to 3 am the next day. Video footage uploaded on Youtube shows a number of violent conduct from Police officers onto those equally violent people.

At the end, the price of damage done was £400,000, 300-400 people were arrested and 113 people were injured, 45 of them police officers. It would be one of the worst riots in the city itself until 2011.
After the Poll Tax was finally implemented, millions of people refused to pay up. The Government tried to turn this about by introducing a reduction in their bills. But it wasn't enough for the people, and Thatcher's popularity plummeted faster than Felix Baumgartner. Even those in her own party were vocally critical of the tax. The backbench MPs opposed her support of the Poll Tax. She became more and more isolated herself from her Cabinet, and eventually was a direct influence on Geoffrey Howe's resignation, leading eventually to her downfall.

The Poll Tax was an absolute failure for Thatcher. In seeking to bring proper payment for public services, the public instead turned on her. After she resigned, the tax was quickly done away with by her successor Kermit the Frog/John Major, replacing it with the still-in-place Council Tax. It was far from being the only reason why she was finally brought down, but it is one of the major ones. The people had spoken out, her Cabinet had spoken out. And the message was clear: Go.

It was the end for 'The Iron Lady'.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So after looking into these main events of her political career, one question remains: What was Margaret Thatcher?

One thing I can note about her was that she was a fighter. She didn't back down easily from making decisions she thought were right for herself and the country. Her steely determination was rigid and once she made a course, she would follow down that path regardless of what anyone else believed. But it also turned many people against her as much as it attracted them. Her decisions against the miners and those against the poll tax had turned warm supporters into very dangerous enemies. And the voters, when they feel betrayed by their government, have the final say. It was the most defining feature of her character.

With her fighting prowess came a certain degree of ruthlessness. Her victory over the miners is still considered to be a crushing blow to the industry and to the people she considered to be the biggest domestic threat. She was also very determined to keep the poll tax in place despite what her Cabinet thought, showing complete uncompromising and disregarding behaviour, in contrast to her time as Education Secretary. Maybe in later years, she became selfish; Someone only answerable to herself because she was in effect the leader of the country.

In my eyes, Margaret Thatcher was a she-wolf in a lion's skin. What I mean by that is that it reminds me of Dr Helen Castor's TV series She-Wolves, how women had managed to overcame adversity to be one of the most powerful people in the world. And the lion has always been a symbol of the UK since God knows when. Thatcher did just that, planning her moves to a tee and making sure in the end she would be victorious, but somewhere along her premiership she lost her way with her determination to force her way onto others. The lion skin fell away to reveal her for what she was: Not the spawn of Satan, nor an angelic creature. But a ruthless fighter who thought she was right the whole time.

The name will be a dividing curb for the nation for many years to come and she will always be loved and hated in some way or another. I just hope the Conservatives don't make a shrine to her........urgh. It will be hiding somewhere in Cameron's office. But I digress. Thatcher will be remembered for both good and bad. She may not be around anymore, but the name will live forever.

Margaret Thatcher. A she-wolf in a Lion's skin.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Because this article took longer than anticipated, it has caused me to lose a week's worth of writing my book, so to make up for that, I will not be posting on here 'til three weeks time. I will have a suprise in store for you then.

Until then, this is the Randomizer signing off!